Search This Blog

Thursday, July 14, 2022

Standing Tall #33

This was one of the very first giraffes I visited, largely because it was one of the most accessible. As with several others, it was displayed in the Botanical Gardens, and quite near the playgrounds given its subject matter. As painted by Martyn Giles and sponsored by Buildtech, the giraffe is given the uniform and colours of the Canterbury Rams, our local basketball team. The Rams are also sponsored by BuildTech, thus explaining the design and the giraffe’s name: Dunk.

And there ends my knowledge of both basketball and this giraffe. To compensate, here’s a fun fact about Hagley Park, in which the Christchurch Botanical Gardens are located: in terms of size it’s second only to New York’s Central Park as the world’s largest intercity park. And now you know.





Friday, July 1, 2022

Woman of the Month: Lúthien Tinúviel

Art by Elena Kukanova

Lúthien Tinúviel from The Silmarillion

There is a scene in the extended cut of The Fellowship of the Ring in which Frodo overhears Aragorn singing softly to himself, and on being asked what woman he sings of, is told: “Tis the ley of Lúthien, the Elf Maiden who gave her love to Beren ... a mortal.” “What happened to her?” “She died.” Although this scene didn’t make the theatrical cut, it’s interesting to me that it’s one of the few times characters of The Silmarillion are directly referenced in Peter Jackson’s films.

In this case, it’s to provide a parallel and precursor to Aragorn and Arwen’s similar love story, that of an Elven woman falling in love with a mortal and giving up her immortality for his sake. Arwen herself was greatly expanded in Jackson’s films; a wise decision given that her role in Tolkien’s trilogy is to be the Standard Hero Reward: a largely off-page non-entity who is the motivation and prize for Aragorn should he successfully reclaim the throne of Gondor.

I believe that at one point Tolkien explicitly regretted not being able to delve more into Arwen’s story, which is told predominantly in the trilogy’s appendixes, and yet in many ways it had already been told by her predecessor (quite literally, Lúthien is Arwen’s great, great grandmother).

I said in my last reading log that Lúthien Tinúviel is perhaps the most significant female character in the entirety of Tolkien’s work, embodying so many of his themes, concepts, philosophies and narrative arcs. And yet – as with Arwen – she in many ways remains a cypher; held at a distance due to the nature of the story and the way in which it’s told.

In any other context than a mythic epic with deliberate Romantic and fairy tale underpinnings, Lúthien would be derided as a Mary Sue. She has unique ancestry (her father is an Elf, her mother a Maiar), is considered the most beautiful creature in all existence, has magical abilities that do whatever is necessary to move the plot forward, can boast a talking dog as a companion and/or steed, and is able to temporarily lull Morgoth himself into an enchanted sleep with the power of her voice.  

After her beloved dies, she becomes a gender-flipped Orpheus and traverses into death itself in order to retrieve the man she loves, moving Mandos, the Valar of Death, to pity and granting herself and Beren a second chance at life. Yes, she defeats Death itself, the first and most inexorable of all nature’s laws. She returns to a mortal life with Beren, ends up wearing one of the legendary Silmarils around her neck, and kickstarts a bloodline of kings that has not yet ended at the conclusion of The Lord of the Rings.

That she sits at the center of Tolkien’s work is undeniable. The religious subtext, his desire to create a mythology for England, the theme of the humble and weak achieving what the powerful cannot... you could take any of the story’s key underpinnings and affix them to Lúthien in some way, for ultimately her story is one of death. First she transcends it, then she embraces it – the first of all the Elves to do so, and for the sake of love.  

That she was dear to Tolkien’s heart is apparent in the fact that her name is carved beneath that of his wife’s on their shared gravestone, and she remains the only female character whose name appears in the title of a published work. Beren first chanced upon her while she danced in a hemlock grove, a scene based upon the real-life occurrence of Edith Tolkien doing the same for her husband after he returned home from the front. As he said years later, after her death:

“I never called Edith Lúthien – but she was the source of the story that in time became the chief part of The Silmarillion. It was first conceived in a small woodland glade filled with hemlocks at Roos in Yorkshire (where I was for a brief time in command of an outpost of the Humber Garrison in 1917, and she was able to live with me for a while). In those days her hair was raven, her skin clear, her eyes brighter than you have seen them, and she could sing – and dance.”

And yet... despite the deep and abiding love Tolkien had for these women, it somehow feels significant that they remain voiceless. We know so little about Edith Tolkien beyond what her husband had to say about her, and as far as I know (and please correct me if I’m wrong) there are no letters, memoirs or interviews from Edith herself – at least none that are easily accessible. Granted, the woman had a right to privacy during her lifetime, and perhaps she valued that. Yet we know little about her beyond her role as Tolkien's wife and muse.

Similarly, neither is any internal perspective or dialogue afforded to Lúthien throughout her story. We know she’s motivated by love, but only ever get a detached recap of the feats she achieves. What were her thoughts and feelings when she first saw Beren? Entered the heart of Morgoth’s fortress? Decided to defy death and seek out Beren’s departed spirit?

This is a criticism that’s tempered by my awareness that The Silmarillion simply wasn’t written to accommodate any level of deep characterization. I know this. Lúthien makes choices and has agency, but like most characters in The Silmarillion, she remains at arm's length from the reader. But my point remains that our only insights into both these women come through Tolkien’s eyes and words. It’s part of the reason I’m a little disappointed that Amazon’s take on the material won’t delve into anything further back than Third Age, as it denies the chance for others to flesh out these female characters.

Sifting deeper into Lúthien’s story – how it might feel to go from eternal life to mortality, why she loved Beren to such an extent, how she moved Mandos to break the laws of nature for her sake, what she thought and felt throughout all of this – is up to each individual reader to ponder. Tolkien only gave us a surface-level understanding of her character (which is not a criticism, just a fact) and left the rest for us to imagine. Like the woman who inspired her, she remains something of a mystery. 

Thursday, June 30, 2022

Reading/Watching Log #79

Well, it’s been a shit month for women. Need I elaborate? Probably not.

At least June taught me something about the joy of low-stakes drama. These days most blockbuster movies and big-budget television shows predicate on catastrophic world-ending apocalypses, where nothing less than life as we know it hangs in the balance. It can get pretty exhausting after a while, especially since you know nothing too drastic is going to happen.

But June gave me at least three stories in which nail-biting suspense was formed by: a sentient bulb of garlic summoning the courage to make a new friend, a middle-aged woman and her friends scrambling to pull off a pilot episode for a cooking show they have to fund themselves, and an animated puppy figuring out how to put on a backpack.

It’s an important reminder that audience investment comes from characters, not circumstances. All the CGI explosions in the world won’t help if there isn’t someone on screen or page that the viewer/reader cares about. Bigger isn’t always better, and these days especially it was a welcome reminder that small victories are important too.

Monday, June 27, 2022

Legend of the Seeker: Touched

A teenage girl is trapped in a high tower by an overbearing parent who forbids her from ever leaving. After seizing an opportunity to finally escape, she finds herself in an overwhelming world she’s never experienced before, coveted by various evil forces for her inherent magical gifts, and forced to rely on a not-particularly trustworthy young man called Flynn.

Incredibly, I’m not talking about Disney’s Tangled, which wasn’t released until a year after this episode of Legend of the Seeker first aired, but both share the same plot synopsis as summarized above.

After a brief hiatus so I could write up my review of The Adventures of Maid Marian, I return to the next episode of Legend of the Seeker, which picks up on the plot-thread of Kahlan learning she’s soon to be the last Confessor in existence. Back to it!

Saturday, June 18, 2022

Links and Updates

I usually try to stagger these posts so that I can include as much interesting stuff as I can in one go, but I am entirely at the mercy of what news is being released at what time. Irony would have it that just a few days after my last Links and Updates post, a huge influx of interesting pop-culture announcements suddenly dropped, so a lot of what you’ll read here is probably considered old news.

But here goes...

Wednesday, June 15, 2022

Review: The Adventures of Maid Marian

For a few months now, I have been beside myself with excitement at the approaching release of a film called The Adventures of Maid Marian, which seemed to combine two of my favourite things: one of the most legendary heroines of all time, and terrible films. Sometimes an awful movie can be just as (if not more so) fun and entertaining as a brilliant one, and judging by the trailer released a couple of months ago, The Adventures of Maid Marian promised to deliver.

Cheap production values, awkward dialogue, performers who looked like they’d been hired straight out of their high school drama club... damn, I love this delightful garbage. These are the sorts of films that make you sit back and ponder: who made this? And why? Where did they get their funding? What inspired them to do any of this? How is it even real?

As such, the film ended up being a mild disappointment in the sense that it wasn’t nearly as bad as I hoped it would be. The plot is relatively coherent. The acting isn’t awful. The cinematography is actually downright gorgeous at times. I was anticipating boom mics dipping into shots and costumes purchased at the two-dollar store; what I got was a by-no-means unwatchable B movie.

But having already hyped this movie so much over the past few months, and (probably) being the only human being on Earth who has actually watched it, I feel honour-bound to dedicate a post to the experience. Here goes...

Wednesday, June 1, 2022

Non-Binary Person of the Month: Jim

Bonifacia “Jim” Jimenez from Our Flag Means Death

If you have spent any time on this blog, you’ll know that one of my favourite storytelling devices is what TV Tropes calls Seamus Is a Girl or Sweet Polly Oliver. I’ve no idea who Seamus or Polly are, but they involve a character (usually a woman) donning a disguise that hides their gender, something the audience may or may not know about beforehand. Think Mulan, Penthesilea, Eowyn, Arya Stark, Alanna of Trebond, Enfys Nest, Djaq from the BBC’s Robin Hood, Morgause in Merlin, Shakespeare’s Portia, Rosalind and Viola... the list goes on. Even Leia disguising herself as a bounty hunter at the beginning of The Return of the Jedi or the teaser trailer for The White Queen counts.

Going in, I was vaguely aware that a character like this existed in Our Flag Means Death, though I ended up idiotically blind to the fact that the mute, heavily bearded pirate called “Jim” who constantly wears a low-brimmed hat over his face was not what he seemed. Originally known as Bonifacia Jimenez, their true identity is revealed when the huge beard and the large prosthetic nose come off so they can enjoy a dip in the ocean.

Turns out that Jim isn’t in disguise just because it’s easier to be a pirate if you’re a man, but because they’re wanted for murder. As a child, they were taken in by nuns after their family was slaughtered by bandits, and raised to be a lethal killing machine who could wreck bloody vengeance once they were old enough.

This they dutifully did – only to discover that the chief bandit was one of the fearsome Spanish Jackie’s nineteen husbands... and now she’s laid a bounty on Jim’s head. Thus, the male disguise.

But also, Jim just kind of likes the way they are. Once the truth comes out to the crew, there are a couple of “Jim’s a girl?” comments, after which everyone sticks to they/them pronouns for the rest of the season. In-universe it’s because no one is quite sure what to make of them, though from a Doylist perspective it’s clearly because the actor is themselves nonbinary/genderfluid (which leads to some amusing commentary at times – you’ve probably already seen the meme about how it’s a win for diversity that a bad guy will use the correct pronouns while he’s busy marooning you on a deserted island).

But as actor Vico Ortiz said in an interview: “it feels like we’re reclaiming the trans and nonbinary stories that oftentimes get overlooked in history books,” which seems like a reference to the likes of Anne Bonny and Mary Read, clearly the inspiration for Jim for having also disguised themselves as men in order to enter the world of piracy during its Golden Age (the jury is out on whether they’ll turn up in season two).

But the most important thing about Jim is that their gender identity isn’t the most interesting thing about them. Their history with the nuns and the bandits, their place on the crew of the Revenge, their relationship with love interest Oluwande and unfinished business with Spanish Jackie – this is what makes up their meaty subplot, one that unfolds right under the noses of the more central love story between Stede and Blackbeard.

Obviously a lot of the commentary surrounding characters like Jim is to do with the show’s queer representation, identity politics, correct use of pronouns, and the positive effect it’s all had on LGBTQIA+ viewers, and the enthusiasm and excitement with which Our Flag Means Death has been met with has been heart-warming. While acknowledging the importance of this, the part of me that has enjoyed the concept of characters dressing up as men since childhood is based on a simpler joy: sometimes it’s just fun to watch characters wearing disguises, hiding who they truly are, experimenting with their identity and how other people perceive them... it’s a both a type of freedom and concealment that’s clearly intrigued audiences since the concept of “gender norms” first began.