Search This Blog

Sunday, January 30, 2022

Reading/Watching Log #74

Here we are, at the start of 2022 and I think I’m finally ready to start processing 2016. Truly, the history books will look back on this time with abject bewilderment, and my current state of mind in dealing with day-to-day life in the time of Covid-19 is “just take one day at a time”. I’ve got two weeks off in March, and oh man – I doubt I’ll get out of bed for their duration.

What are my goals for this year? Less television, more books. I started leaning into this mentality at the end of 2021 and discovered that my creative juices began flowing almost immediately. Writing original fiction again feels great, and I definitely want to chase that feeling. Or as this post put it:

I’m also going to try and pay attention to my own TBR pile of books instead of checking out stacks of library books (this was my resolution last year, and I fell off the wagon in October) though it’s difficult to resist the siren song of the new release shelf.

And when it comes to shows, I’m going to try finishing up some of the stuff I started and never completed. When was the last time I watched How To Get Away With Murder?

Thursday, January 27, 2022

Recommendations: The Best of 2021

Perhaps it’s too late to be doing this near the end of January, but here’s a quick wrap-up of some of my posts, views and recommendations of 2021...

I wrote very little meta this year, with one being The Craft and the Craft Legacy, which I wasn’t particularly happy with. It’s too long and a bit repetitive, and I’m not even sure I got my point across – but hey, it was fun returning to one of my favourite witchy films and its misbegotten sequel.

If that one was too long, then The Problem With Witches was too short, and barely scratched the surface of my theory: that fictional depictions of witches – whether old or modern – share a deep consternation about the idea of a woman with hard power, and do everything they can to alleviate the perceived threat. Perhaps I’ll return to this subject at a later date with more examples to flesh out the argument.

I did have a lot of fun working through the first season of The Legend of the Seeker, and even though I couldn’t find the time to post on the season finale, it’s on its way. And then my first ever watch of season two will begin! I’m so excited about this, especially since I’ve been delaying it for over a decade!

Other than that, I managed only three in-depth reviews this year: for Raya and the Last Dragon, the first season of Shadow and Bone, and the three Irish-inspired films of Cartoon Saloon studios.

As for the best of this year’s watching and reading material...

Thursday, January 20, 2022

Top Six Best Film/Television Moments of 2021

There are not as many “greatest moments” this year (or technically, last year) as I spent most of 2021 catching up on my extensive back catalogue. For whatever reason, I wasn’t watching a lot of brand-new material – more than that, I was trying to cut back on my screen-time anyway. Plus, my attempts to give each month a specific theme certainly limited most of my options.

But a few projects managed to slip through my carefully curated net, and there was some fun stuff to behold. So instead of my usual Top Twelve Best Film/Television Moments of the Year, here’s the Top Six of 2021...

Sunday, January 9, 2022

Women of the Year: A Retrospective 2021

This is always my favourite post of the year, a chance for me to delve into my absolute favourite subject: the representation of female characters throughout media and pop-culture.

Every month I dub a fictional character my Woman of the Month, but there are always plenty of spots left over, and so I do a retrospective of the entire years’ worth of interesting female characters that maybe didn’t get the limelight they deserved.

And this is just the stuff I was able to consume this year: at the end of the day I’m just one person, and there is so much material out there. If you have recommendations, or specifically a female character of any kind that you felt got short-shrift in the public discourse, then by all means throw your hat in the ring.

Below are the female characters that didn’t quite make the monthly cut, but who I still found noteworthy in what they brought to the various stories they were a part of. There are less of them this year, partly because I’m exhausted, partly because I didn’t watch or read as much, and partly because a lot of what I did get through has already featured on his blog in the past (for example, I watched the fifth season of Supergirl last month, but Kara Danvers and Nia Nal have already been written about in earlier posts) but hopefully you’ll still find something of interest.

Saturday, January 1, 2022

Woman of the Month: Trinity

Trinity from The Matrix franchise 

Let’s kick off the year by talking about Trinity. I’ve just seen The Matrix Resurrections and there’s a lot to say.

In terms of feminist icons, Trinity doesn’t quite get the same level of attention as those other sci-fi queens, the likes of Ellen Ripley and Sarah Connor. But why not? First introduced in 1999, she’s got a lot going on.

Trinity is the star of the riveting opening sequence, a jaw-dropping action set-piece that introduces bullet time, the film’s black leather aesthetic, the importance of pay-phones, and the shimmering lines of green data that makes up the Matrix.

The one and only explicit nod to her gender is when she first meets Neo and he remarks: “I thought you were a guy,” to which she wryly responds: “most guys do.” And she gets some of the film’s best scenes, from ordering herself to: “get up Trinity, get up,” when she’s frozen with terror, to the undisputed best moment of the whole franchise: “dodge this.”

What often goes unremarked upon is the incredible performance by Carrie Anne Moss, who captures to perfection the Action Girl and Ice Queen tropes, and yet is still brimming with emotion and unspoken conviction. (Seriously, watch her face when Neo asks her what the Oracle told her – in hindsight we know that it’s that she’ll fall in love with him, something she’s not remotely ready to say out loud at this point, but which is right there on her face... even behind sunglasses!)

It’s a shame therefore, that her most lasting pop-culture contribution is the use of her name in coining the term Trinity Syndrome. This basically amounts to a female character who – during the course of the story – is never allowed to be as cool as she was in her introductory scene. Instead, she will take on the role of guide, confidant, love interest or (worst of all) distressed damsel/fridged woman for the sake of the male protagonist, the true hero of the story.

This guy will most likely be the audience surrogate: ignorant and untrained in the details of the world-building, and a blank slate personality-wise. It’s usually the woman’s task to show him the ropes before he inevitably surpasses her in skills and importance. But hey – there’s still an opening for his girlfriend!

Give or take a few of these elements and you can see how prolific it is: Valka and Astrid, Mera and Atlanna, Tigress and Wyldstyle (lampshaded in the sequel), Tauriel and Alice Quinn. Heck, Penny way back in the Inspector Gadget cartoons, played entirely for laughs! We can still like these female characters – more often than not they come with great designs, are filled with spunk and skill, played by great actresses, even have plenty of dimensionality – the rub is that they’re not ever allowed to be the main character.

How does all this relate to Trinity? It’s true that the narrative laid out for her in the first film is not to be the Chosen One, but to identify him through the act of falling in love with him. It throws up the question: does she loves Neo for himself, or does she loves him because the Oracle prepped her to do so, Self-Fulfilling Prophecy style?

Not helping is that there’s no clear reason outside this prophecy as to why she would love Neo, beyond the fact that he looks like Keanu Reeves, exuding those chill Keanu Reeves vibes (I mean, I get it – but I would have preferred a little more).

It’s an odd conundrum for me, as though I can enjoy this plot-twist in the spirit with which it’s given, I can still recognize the limitations it places on Trinity. That her most important contribution to the plot is to fall in love is something that can’t help but grate a little.

Sequels Reloaded and Revolutions (at least as far as I can recall, it’s been years since I saw them) are not particularly kind to Trinity – she still gets some cool action sequences, but the climax of the first film involves her being saved by Neo, and in the second one she dies in a remarkably stupid and anticlimactic way.

As such, I was deeply interested in seeing how she would be handled in Resurrections. In the twenty years since the first film, Lana Wachowski has undoubtedly become aware of the term Trinity Syndrome and (like Phil Lord and Chris Miller in The Lego Movie sequel) had the opportunity to challenge it this time around. So did she?

SPOILERS

Kinda?

Trinity didn’t exactly get the massive upheaval in narrative importance that I was hoping for, and Neo is still very much the protagonist, but there’s definitely some interrogation of the trope at work. What transpires after the original trilogy (as far as I can tell – I’ve only seen it once and there’s a lot to absorb) is that Neo and Trinity’s bodies were taken away by rogue machines, brought back to life, and plugged back into the Matrix. Their love for each other is a form of powerful energy (just go with it) that leads a program known as the Analyst to create a situation in which they are together yet apart, in real life as well as in the Matrix. When Neo is freed for the second time, he has only one goal: get Trinity out as well.

But of course, realizing that she’s been put in the role of a passive distressed damsel, the script works overtime to emphasize that she must choose this. Will she return to Neo, or will she remain in the role of a soccer mum; a life of obligations to needy children and a husband that’s literally called Chad? What do you think?

She rejects her false identity as “Tiffany” and kicks ass. In the climactic scene, Neo falls and Trinity flies. Then she beats the crap out of the machine that put her in this nightmare scenario and goes forth to change the world for the better.

It’s not quite the triumphant repudiation of Trinity Syndrome I was hoping for, but hey – I’ll take it. Trinity lives again. She has the same power-set as her boyfriend. A fifty-four year old woman is allowed a reality-altering love story. She and Neo literally fly off into the sunset together.

All things considered, Trinity remains a bit of an enigma. Lana Wachowski is on record as being inspired to write Resurrections after the death of her parents, and this sentiment is clearly the driving force of the film itself: to bring comfort and catharsis to herself and an audience that didn’t get a happy ending the first time around. There’s a surprising softness and kindness in this film, just as there is a surprising softness and kindness in Neo and Trinity. If it means that Trinity, on her own terms, is still just a tad underserved – well, I can live with that in exchange for the sight of her whirling away through the sky, hand in hand with the man she loves.